POLLUTEME/POLLUTED EZINE/Covers vs Originals
Covers vs Originals
written by: Jacob Robison
     There are essentially two different types of bands
that are playing on the local scene. There are
those bands - such as Lowboy, Lower Unit and
Apathy - that write and play their own material.
And there are those bands - such as Hoosier
Daddy, The Boo Dogs and The New Wave
Nation - that make good money playing other
people's songs. Here's the question: which type
is better? Hoping to find the answer, I drug out
my email list of some of the bands that I know
around the area and asked them several questions
on the topic. Several of the bands replied
(thankfully, or else I would have nothing to write
about) within a couple of days. Here's what they
had to say.
     The first question that I asked was which is better
for a band to be, a cover band or an original
band? Charley Grubbs, drummer for Lowboy,
wrote: "I guess that's a matter of taste and what
you're trying to accomplish. Cover bands usually
have an easier time getting paying gigs on a
regular basis. The pay starts off better, but
usually doesn't go much higher after a payment is
set. On the other hand, original bands obviously
can make more money if they become
established" Josh Claxton, lead guitarist for
Unenlightened, added- "I'd have to say an
original band is better. I mean, think about it.
Whens the last time you thought 'hey I wanna
listen to someone try to play another person's
songs the exact way that they do?' Music is an
art and its' main purpose is creative expression.
There's nothing creative about duplication. Have
you ever seen someone who wanted a career
painting copies of the Mona Lisa? Sounds kinda
dumb, doesn't it?"
     Jacob Harper, lead guitarist for Hoosicr Daddy,
wrote this in his response: "I've been playing in
bands for the past ten years, and have found out
how hard it is to get your own music out there I
love playing music, and to continue playing it
costs money. So you have to look at things from
some financial standpoint, as much as that bites.
Hoosicr Daddy has been playing for about a year
and a half now. We mostly play covers to get our
name out and to pay for all of the expensive toys
that we have to buy... if I hear one more person
say that we are sellouts for playing cover music, I
believe I will have to choke him until he realizes
that we arc out there playing music every week
and busting our ass all for the music."
     The second question that I posed to the panel of
musicians was 'what advantages and
disadvantages docs being a cover band give
you?' Richard Smith of Apathy wrote; "the
advantages arc everyone knows your songs, and
it's easier to get gigs. The disadvantage is... I
hope you really love playing in bars in front of
drunks your entire life, because that's all you'll
ever do" Dale Leaver, drummer for Lower Unit,
wrote: "The only advantage is you can make
money playing other people's shit in some gay
bars and shit." Charley Grubbs wrote- "Cover
bands are usually "lower maintenance'. What i
mean is, although there is a lot of work that has to
be done for each kind of bond, cover bands
usually have less because they're not writing
original music, gigs come easier, and shopping
for a label is not a major concern. Plus, you can
have a cover band that just plays weekends and
practices once a week to learn new songs, and it
can run smoothly. Any original band knows that
much more work has to be done in order to get
label attention and to establish a following."
     The third question that I asked was what
advantages and disadvantages does being an
original band give you? Josh Claxton's response:
"You have more potential to succeed for one
thing... writing songs is good catharsis.
Creativity is praised. Anyone who writes good
original songs is more likely to acquire a fan base
(at least one who really likes the music, and not
just for image), and it makes you feel good inside
to have people you hardly know sing along to a
song that you wrote." Richard Smith added:
"The advantages arc when people come to you
shows to hear your music, and there arc a lot of
them actually singing along to them...there is
nothing that compares to that The disadvantage
is that there are a lot of bars and clubs that don't
like to book a band unless you do a lot of
covers." Charley wrote: "Advantages:
opportunity to make outrageous amounts of
money; more chances to tour
nationally/internationally; sense of
accomplishment for writing own material, doing
something that no one has ever done.
Disadvantages: less gigs at first, harder to keep
together, more work, harder to establish your
sound
    
The last question that I asked was how do you
select which songs to cover? Dale wrote: "We
(Lower Unit) only cover one song, and we picked
it because it was cool and we thought that we
could do it better." Josh: "I personally select
songs that I think I can change to fit my style and
still sound good. Playing a cover can be
extremely creative if you can play it differently
than the original and make it sound as good,
maybe better. Most cover bands select songs that
they really like and/or the crowd will recognize
easily." Richard's response: "We (Apathy) just
play a few cover songs. We just play what we
like. If we like a song by Black Sabbath, we
learn it But we don't like to do too many cover
songs . we are an original band."
    
My own opinions about cover songs and cover
bands are varied. There is nothing wrong with
playing covers. Many well-known bands got their
start by redoing a song; Limp Bizkit and "Faith"
and Marilyn Manson and "Sweet Dreams" are
just a couple. Mctallica and Guns and Roses both
released full-length CDs with nothing but covers
on them (Garage Days Revisited and The
Spaghetti Incident, respectively). On the local
scene, Sub-Method redid the Phil Collins classic
"In the Air Tonight", and they make it sound
much better. Lower Unit does an excellent job of
taking the Three Six Mafia's song "Hit a
Muthafucka" and making it their own. To do that
takes talent.
    
The one plus that I see to being a cover band is
that you get to play a wide variety of styles and
songs in the same set. Hoosier Daddy does an
excellent job of mixing up the songs and styles;
the one time that I've been able to check them out
they played everything from The Doors, to The
Parliament Funkadelic All-stars to Rage Against
The Machine. They even brought a friend on
stage to play some electric fiddle with mem.
They covered the tastes of the crowd like a pro.
Playmg such a wide variety of sounds can't get
boring and repetitive. Jacob Harper wrote: "The
people we surround ourselves with enjoy having
a good time, get into the music, and most of all
realize that we have enough talent to do what we
want to do, whether it be covers or originals."
    
The only bad thing that I can say about cover
bands is when they attempt to sell their own CDs
during a set in which they've played nothing buy
covers. So far I've only seen this once, and I
laughed my ass off. Midway through their third
. set the guitarist starting complaining that no one
was buying their CD. I wonder why? If the band
would've been playing the material off of the
CD, then maybe someone would buy it if the
music was original. If the CD was the same
material that they played that nigfat, then that's
the reason no one was buying them. If I'm going
to spend money on a CD I'm going to buy the
one by the artist'who wrote the song; not a band
that covers it.
    
My allegiance, however, resides with bands that
produce original songs and sounds. These bands
are kings of the scene, because they play songs
that you simply can't hear anywhere but where
they are playing. They add flavor to the area,
giving it something that you can't get anywhere
else. And a break from the mainstream bullshit is
always greatly appreciated.
    
Both kinds of bands have their place in the music
industry. Both have certain advantages and
disadvantages that go along with them. And both
kinds certainly require a lot of hard work and
talent to pull them off effectively- Even though
cover bands maybe easier to start off with,
original bands have more of an opportunity to
achieve greater heights. It all depends on if the
musicians involved are willing to put in the
necessary work. And there isn't a rule that says
cover bands can't make the transition from
playing covers to playing originals. Whichever
kind of band that you enjoy listening to, you
should get behind them and support them in
every way that you possibly can. Without them,
life would suck.